Agenda
-
Coffee
-
Enhesa Product Intelligence service presentation and platform demo
-
Welcome and introduction
-
KEYNOTE: How the UPFAS restriction is likely to impact the biocides sector
- What is happening when?
- Why is this restriction like no other before?
- What is at stake for biocides?
Marko SušnikAdvisor to the Secretary General on Chemicals Policy, SMEunited, and Senior Advisor Chemical Policy, Austrian Federal Economic Chamber (WKÖ), SMEunited / WKÖ - Session 4: Regulatory developments in the EU biocides sector
-
Member state initiative: Belgium’s new free circuit/closed-circuit system for biocidal products
- Relevant legal framework
- Overview of the closed-circuit system’s purpose in monitoring dangerous biocides
- Types of biocides under surveillance
- Obligations for each category of stakeholders
- Overview of sectors participating in the system (manufacturers, distributors, users)
- Key features of the tool used for tracking and reporting
Ali QadariSPOC Inspection Biocides, Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment, Belgium -
Ctgb’s experiences with evaluation of active substances: Recent developments and challenges
- Application types
- Lessons learned
- Ways forward
-
Q&A
-
Refreshment and networking
- Focus on recent tightening of processes and procedures under the BPR
-
A company perspective on impacts of the changes to the biocides early review process
- Early review process
- Impact on existing/on-going product authorization and marketability
- Challenges faced by the industry
-
Red tape, green goals: Can you navigate the regulatory tightrope to innovate and achieve sustainability?
- Regulatory landscape: Biocidal products face stringent regulations and high costs. How can we align green goals with economic realities and the ECHA/MSCA fee structure?
- Navigating hurdles: What do recent process changes in the SBP and MSCA expectations mean for the approval of existing biocidal products?
- Driving innovation: How can we foster innovation amid uncertainties regarding the future of certain chemicals (for example, CLP, ED) while ensuring efficiency and compliance?
An exchange of ideas between
-
Tightening requirements for data quality: Practical dilemma for biocides testing
- How to analyse wipes – pros and cons of different approaches
- Stability studies on wipes
- Stability studies on trigger sprayers – intermittent use
-
Short introduction to the panel discussion
-
Q&A and panel discussion: Will the tightening of processes and procedures move the system forward and clear the backlog?
Additional panelist:
-
Lunch and networking
- Session 5: Sustainability and alternatives under the BPR
-
Assessment of alternatives (AoA) for 'approval by derogation' and pragmatic tools to help applicants to get through the first, most difficult stage
- Approval by derogation under BPR – a brief history
- Your active substance is a candidate for substitution – what's next?
- Required elements for AoA
- How to start your AoA – tips, tricks and tools
Martijn van VelthovenManaging Consultant and Toxicologist, VelTox Strategy Consultancy / Rules4Regulatory -
The EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability: How amended water directives are impacting biocides
- Waste Water Directive
- Water Framework Directive
- Drinking water guidance
- Extended Producer Responsibility and other sustainability drivers
-
Q&A session
-
Refreshment break
- Session 6: Beyond the EU BPR
-
Moderator
-
EU/GB BPR divergence and the biocides market
- Post-Brexit: What do EU and GB BPR look like now?
- Divergence: What is happening now and what is on the horizon?
- What you should already know and how to prepare
-
Update on US biocidal regulations
- US registrations and reviews now facing massive delays
- delay snapshot
- causes
- possible remedies and timing
- impact of election
- PFAS regulation impact on biocides: a preview for the EU based on the US experience
- US registrations and reviews now facing massive delays
-
Q&A session
-
End of conference