Agenda

  1. Coffee

  2. Welcome and introduction by the moderator

    Andrew Turley Andrew Turley
    Science Editor, Chemical Watch News & Insight, Enhesa Product Intelligence
  3. Keynote: Compliance – a profit center?

    Rui Resendes Rui Resendes
    Director of Development, Change Chemistry
  4. Session 4: How can we push innovation and bring safer and more sustainable chemistry successfully to market?
  5. Innovation hubs and substitution planning project updates

    • The European Commission is stepping up to shape the future of chemicals – making them safer, more sustainable and fit for tomorrow’s economy
    • Hubs to support the development and uptake of safer alternatives and to provide hands-on technical guidance, market intelligence and capacity-building support – especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and industries ready to innovate
    • The EU network of Substitution Centres study has laid the groundwork for mapping out how such a network could work in practice
    Florina-Andreea Pantazi Florina-Andreea Pantazi
    Head of Unit – REACH, DG GROW, European Commission
  6. LANXESS product sustainability monitor: Improving the sustainability performance of our product portfolio, substituting critical products and developing safe alternatives

    • Introduction to the LANXESS Product Sustainability Monitor and its methodology for assessing and improving product portfolio sustainability performance across environmental, social, and economic criteria
    • LANXESS Product Roadmap strategic approach to examine critical substances in chemical end products and the potential for safe and sustainable alternatives
    Anna Schröder Anna Schröder
    Head of Global Product Stewardship, Lanxess
  7. Case study: Overcoming supply chain barriers to substitution

    • The problem of inertia and fear risk aversion is the multi-million-euro handbrake
    • The solution is value chain cooperation backed by a transparent and predictable regulation
    • SVHC replacement in polymer foams with safe and sustainable alternatives case study 
    Pedro Correia Pinto Pedro Correia Pinto
    Global Market Manager, Solvay
  8. Q&A

  9. Refreshment break and networking 

  10. Case study: Challenges for alternatives providers

    • Overview of substitution challenges from the chemical industry point of view
    • Regulatory barriers to substitution
    • Market adoption and supply chain constraints
    • Conclusion: How we can accelerate the shift to safer and more sustainable materials. The business case for ‘greener chemistry’ 
    Alessandro Napoli Alessandro Napoli
    Components Innovation and Product Regulatory Lead, Huntsman – Advanced Materials Division
  11. Industry cooperation groups, THE solution to speeding up substitution

    Elke Van Asbroeck Elke Van Asbroeck
    CEO, Apeiron-Team NV
  12. Q&A and panel discussion: How can we push innovation and bring safer and more sustainable solutions successfully to market?

  13. Lunch and networking

  14. Session 5: How best to deal with chemical mixtures
  15. Scientific perspective on mixtures and the mixture assessment factor (MAF)

    • What does mixture toxicology tell us about mixture effects?
    • Are real-world mixtures having an impact on human health and the environment?
    • What are the approaches to measure or predict mixture effects? 
    Olwenn Martin Olwenn Martin
    Associate Professor in Health and Environment, University College London (UCL)
  16. Advancing the risk assessment of chemical mixtures throughout the food chain

    • State of play on the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals  
    • Strategies for prioritizing and grouping of chemicals in the food chain
    • Challenges to the integration of non-dietary sources of exposure 

    VIRTUAL PRESENTATION   

    Bruno Dujardin Bruno Dujardin
    Team Leader – Analysis Team, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
  17. One factor fits all? The MAF from an industry perspective

    • MAF as a regulatory risk management tool – intent versus practical reality
    • Practical implications for substance assessment, innovation and competitiveness
    • Constructive alternatives and conditions for a workable approach 

     

    Teresa Bernheim Teresa Bernheim
    Senior Manager Chemicals Policy, LANXESS
  18. Exposure to mixtures is a reality. What is the most practical regulatory approach to improve protection?

    • A wide range of industrial chemicals are present in people’s bodies and in natural environments 
    • Mixtures of chemicals can have greater impact on human health and wildlife, due to mixture effects
    • REACH should provide a 'High Level of Protection’   the reality of exposure to mixtures is one reason why this is not currently being delivered
    • Mixtures are complex to address, but a MAF is a pragmatic and realistic approach to improve the level of protection   
    Michael Warhurst Michael Warhurst
    Executive Director, CHEM Trust, United Kingdom
  19. Refreshment break and networking

  20. Q&A and panel discussion: Potential consequences of using MAF for regulatory management

  21. Networking drinks reception

    Join us for drinks, appetizers and relaxed networking with our speakers and other attendees!  

  22. End of day two

View previous day

/ next day