Programme
Timings are in CEST
- Session 1 - The Future of Fluoropolymers Beyond the Proposed EU PFAS Restriction
-
Welcome and introduction
- Authority Perspectives
-
Keynote How does the EU PFAS restriction contribute to the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability ambition and how can fluoropolymers be considered in that context?
Cristina de Avila
Head of Unit, Sustainable Chemicals, Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission -
Overview of progress of the PFAS restriction proposal under REACH and next steps
- Progress made so far
- Studies on several uses
- Next steps, especially next consultation round (mid July till mid September)
-
Information needs for a targeted PFAS restriction
- What we know
- Data gaps
- Other helpful information
- No data, no market?
-
Q&A and panel discussion
-
Break and networking
- Exposure and Life Cycle Issues of Fluoropolymers
-
Fluoropolymer applications in the context of the EU Green Deal
- Fluoropolymers have unique physico-chemical properties and should be distinguished from other PFASs
- Fluoropolymers are irreplaceable and critical for enabling the EU Green Deal and the competitiveness of EU industry
Ronald Bock
Senior Advocacy and Regulatory Manager, AGC Chemicals Europe / Chair of the Fluoropolymer Group, PlasticsEurope -
Case Study: The importance of fluoropolymers across the hydrogen value chain
- Contribution of hydrogen technologies to the Green Deal
- PFAS use in hydrogen technologies: the case of PEM electrolysers and fuel cells
- Role of research for use reduction and potential alternatives
- End-of-life considerations
-
Case Study: The road to PFAS-free footwear
- Detox journey – a class approach and restricted substances list (RSL) best practices
- North Star of this journey – safe, effective, affordable and avoiding ‘regrettable substitutions’
- Ubiquitous – why in all these places?
- Step-by-step guide
- Challenges
- Conclusion
-
Are fluoropolymers really of low concern for human and environmental health, and separate from other PFASs?
- The history of pollution from fluoropolymer production is closely tied to use of PFASs as polymer processing aids
- Monomer, oligomer and synthesis byproduct are emitted during the production of fluoropolymers
- Fluoropolymers are persistent, and there are major questions around the disposal of fluoropolymers
-
Overview of key legal issues in connection with the proposed PFAS restriction as it applies to PTFE
- Review of the proposed restriction for PFASs under REACH as it applies to PTFE
- Analysis of the grouping approach held by the proposed PFAS restriction with regards to the restriction’s conditions set forth by REACH (effectiveness, practicability and monitorability)
- Review of the proposed PFAS restriction as it applies to PTFE with regards to the fundamental legal principles of the EU (proportionality, subsidiarity)
-
Q&A
-
Short break
-
Session 1 panel discussion
- Given that fluoropolymer exposures vary widely, how should we be thinking about exposure?
- What is driving the presence of highly stable chemistries in products with different life cycles?
Cristina de Avila
Head of Unit, Sustainable Chemicals, Directorate-General for Environment, European CommissionRonald Bock
Senior Advocacy and Regulatory Manager, AGC Chemicals Europe / Chair of the Fluoropolymer Group, PlasticsEurope -
Networking, break and Chemical Watch live demo 14.05–14.50
- Session 2 - PFAS Alternatives
-
Alternatives case study 1
Switching to fluorine-free water repellent solutions in textile applications: Selected case studies highlighting feasibility, obstacles and limitations in switching from C6-fluorocarbon based solutions to PFAS-free.
- Chemical background and how water repellency works (elementary level)
- Performance differences and limitations of C6 and PFAS-free textile applications
- The main challenges in moving to PFAS-free
-
Alternatives case study 2
PFAS-free cook and bakeware
The Cookware Company has been offering a PFAS-free choice of non-stick cookware to the consumer since 2007. They will expand on how they brought their ceramic coating technology to fruition as a viable, affordable alternative to replace various other uses of PTFE.
-
Panel discussion: PFAS alternatives
- Alternatives are already on the market, but are they effective? What is in them? How can we avoid regrettable substitution because of lack of data?
- Is there truly an ‘alternative’ for the carbon-fluorine bond, which is powerful and unique? Beyond what is already on the market, how do we encourage innovation? Is there a viable pathway via ‘safe and sustainable by design’? Are the commercial incentives sufficient? Are there lessons to be learned from other sectors that invest heavily in R&D? Are rules about protection of intellectual property rights working well in this context?
Moderator: Andrew Turley, Science Editor, Chemical Watch
-
Short break
- Session 3 - Updates from the US
-
Moderator:
-
Overview of PFASs in the US: Uses and history
Robert J. Simon
Vice President, Chemical Products & Technology Divisions, American Chemistry Council -
Q&A
-
Chemical identity and the EPA process for approving new PFAS chemicals
-
Q&A
-
Regulating PFASs as a class – a panel session
Panellists:
Dr Anna Reade
Staff Scientist, Healthy People & Thriving Communities Program, Natural Resources Defense Council, USA -
Q&A
-
Short break
-
An overview of all pending or anticipated US federal regulations
-
The Proposed TSCA (8) PFAS Reporting Rule
-
Q&A
-
EPA-regulated products and PFASs including the recent pesticides and PFAS issue
-
Food contact materials regulations and PFASs
-
Q&A
-
State level actions – a panel session
Karl Palmer
Chief, Safer Consumer Products Branch, California Department of Toxic Substances Control -
Q&A
-
Close of conference